Seahawks ink RB Ganther

Football Betting Lines

03/18/2010 - Renton, WA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Seattle Seahawks signed running back Quinton Ganther to a one-year contract, the team announced on Thursday.

The 25-year-old Ganther rushed the ball 62 times for 201 yards and three touchdowns last season for the Redskins. The Utah product started the final four games of the 2009 season.

Ganther was originally selected by the Titans in the seventh round of the 2006 draft. He has rushed for 262 yards and three touchdowns in 25 career games with Tennessee and Washington.

Wwwmaxpages Football Betting News

<< St. Mary's ends tourney drought with win over Richmond
Providence, RI (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Omar Samhan led all scorers with 29 points and added 12 rebounds, as St. Mary's earned an 80-71 win over Richmond in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. Mickey McConnell hit five three-pointers and

<< Baylor gets by Sam Houston State
New Orleans, LA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Ekpe Udoh put up 20 points, 13 rebounds and five assists, and Baylor used a late run to pull away from Sam Houston State for a 68-59 victory in first-round action of the South Region. LaceDarius Dun

<< Giants sign Australian punter Bond
East Rutherford, NJ (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The New York Giants have signed Australian punter Jy Bond. Bond, a former Australian rules football player at the semi-professional level, was with the Miami Dolphins last year before b

<< Kansas State pummels North Texas
Oklahoma City, OK (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Denis Clemente had 17 points and six assists as Kansas State dominated North Texas, 82-62, in the first round of the West Region of the NCAA Tournament Curtis Kelly and Jacob Pullen each had 15 p

<< Arsenal's Fabregas to return against West Ham
London, England (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Arsenal captain Cesc Fabregas is set to return from injury against West Ham United on Saturday. The Spain midfielder has been sidelined since a 3-1 victory over Burnley at the beginning of the month

NHL suspends Ducks D Wisniewski eight games >>
Toronto, ON (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The National Hockey League suspended Anaheim Ducks defenseman James Wisniewski for eight games without pay on Thursday. Wisniewski was given a minor penalty for charging early in the second period for a ha

Dempsey sends Fulham past Juve in Europa >>
London, England (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Clint Dempsey scored in the 82nd minute and Zoltan Gera had two goals, leading Fulham to a 4-1 win over 10-man Juventus on Thursday and into the quarterfinals of the Europa League on aggregate, 5-4. Bobby Z

Burnley's Laws not worried about sack talk >>
Burnley, England (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Burnley boss Brian Laws insists he is not concerned by reports claiming he could be sacked just weeks into his Turf Moor reign. Clarets chairman Barry Kilby has dismissed suggestions that the Premier Leag

Willis leads Transitions Championship >>
Palm Harbor, FL (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Garrett Willis, a local resident playing on a sponsor's exemption, shot a six-under 65 on Thursday to take the first-round lead of the Transitions Championship. Defending champion Retief Goosen, Jonathan

Jets S Smith signs tender >>
East Rutherford, NJ (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The New York Jets announced on Thursday that safety Eric Smith has signed his tendered contract. Last season with the Jets, his fourth in the NFL, he played in all 16 games, starting four. He totaled 48

How did changes to college football betting rules affect bettors?

The 2007 college football rules changes that were implemented to shorten games are now history. The NCAA rules committee did what they set out to do; games were cut by an average of 14 minutes per game last season. There were also, on average, 14 fewer plays per game. We’ll get into how that did (or didn’t) affect games in regards to the pointspread a bit later.

While the NCAA rules committee may have had the betterment of the game in mind, they'll now “turn back the clock” for next season. Two key rules have now been overturned by the NCAA committee for the 2007 season, something definitely for the better.

For those of you who may not remember what those rules actually were, let us refresh your memory.

1) The first one was actually starting the clock on a kickoff as soon as the kicker touched the ball rather than waiting until the returner touched it. The problem here was near the end of the half (or game), if the team leading was kicking off, they could milk the clock by intentionally running offsides and then re-kicking. They could run 10-15 seconds off the clock each play while taking just five-yard penalties each time. They could run the clock down and simply cause the half (or game) to end on a kickoff, keeping the opposing offense off the field. In 2007, the clock will now start when the returner touches the ball as it had before last season.

2) The second rule dealt with starting the clock after a change of online football betting possession rather than waiting until the ball was snapped. This took a lot of time off the clock throughout the game as teams changed possession, however it caused the most problems late in games (or halves). Rather than huddling up and calling a play, the offensive team would have to rush onto the field as the clock started. This was a definite disadvantage to a team that was trying to come from behind late in the game. This year the clock will start on a change of possession, after the ball is snapped.

How did those rules affect the college game last year and will it make a difference this year when it comes to the pointspread? We commonly heard two theories when it came to these changes. First, it would affect scoring negatively. Second, it would hurt favorites as they would have less time and fewer plays to cover the number.

Did the rules hurt scoring? Yes. It seemed obvious that shortening the game by what amounted to 14 plays would push scoring downward. That was the case last year. Of the 119 Division 1A teams, 69 squads scored fewer points in 2007 than they did in 2005. Just 48 teams had a higher PPG scoring average and two stayed the same. Almost 59 percent of the teams in college football last year had a lower PPG average than they did in 2005. Expect more scoring in 2007 as we revert back to the old rules.

Did the rules hinder favorites from covering the number in 2007? Not really. Last year the favorites posted an overall spread record of 336-350-16 (48.9 percent). The year before, favorites were 316-326-13 (49.2 percent). In 2004, the favorites were 316-339-2 (48.2 percent). In fact, college football favorites have been above 50 percent for the season just once in the last seven years (in 2003). Last year’s numbers fell right in line with where they have been historically.

How about big favorites? The rules must have hurt them? Maybe a little bit. Double-digit favorites last year came in at a 47.8 percent clip compare with an average of just over 50 percent over the last seven years. Since 1980, favorites of -10 or more have covered at exactly a 50 percent clip (measured over 6,716 games).

Even bigger favorites must have struggled? Not really. In fact, it was just the opposite. Favorites of three TD’s or more were 59-54-2 last year (52.2 percent). Since 2000, those same favorites (-21 or higher) hit at 51.3 percent and since 1990 came in a clip of 50.3 percent. Stepping it up a notch to four TD favorites or higher, we actually see they've covered at a much better rate last season than before. Last year, favorites of -28 or more were 31-21-1, or almost 60 percent. Historically, four-TD-or-higher favorites have come in at a 50.7 percent spot since 2000 and only 48.9 percent since 1990. The “perceived” problem with the favorites covering at a reduced rate really never came to fruition.

Bottom line is, there might be some more scoring in 2007, but no real revelations when it comes to finding any pointspread golden nuggets.

To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on college football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.